Himeji-Ken V. Dela Peña, Regina P. Galigao, and April Mae D. Gabutero (Authors)
Abstract
Assessment and evaluation play a crucial role in measuring student learning and instructional effectiveness. This document categorizes assessment into Formative and Summative Assessments and Authentic and Standardized Evaluation Methods. Formative assessments, such as quizzes, class discussions, and peer reviews, provide ongoing feedback to enhance learning, while summative assessments, including final exams and standardized tests, evaluate overall achievement. Authentic evaluation methods emphasize real-world applications, competency-based tasks, and technology-enhanced assessments, ensuring students develop practical skills. The integration of criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments allows for both individualized and comparative evaluations. By employing rubrics, self-assessments, and validated instruments, educators can ensure reliable and fair evaluation processes. These methods support continuous improvement in both teaching and learning by aligning assessments with curriculum goals. A balanced approach to assessment fosters deeper understanding, critical thinking, and skill mastery, preparing students for academic and professional success.
Read the full text here.
Keywords: assessment, evaluation, formative and summative, authentic assessment, instructional effectiveness